|
50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CARIBBEAN CRISIS
The 'incompatible' island
Gabriel Molina
Franchossi
ON January 31, 1962 – 50 years ago –
an event which had been brewing for nine months was
finally consummated. It would later be known as "the
only moment in history when the world was on the
brink of nuclear war." (1)
The prologue to this conflict was
the 8th Consultation Meeting of Foreign Relations
Ministers of the region, created by the United
States diplomatic corps to strangle Cuba’s new
government. The Berlin Wall, and everything else,
was overshadowed by Kennedy’s desire to avenge the
family’s honor, lost in the Bay of Pigs.
Overthrowing Castro was the U.S. government’s first
priority, according to Attorney General Robert
Kennedy, when he spoke with CIA Director John McCone,
January 19, 1962. (2)
In December 1961, the Organization
of American States’ (OAS) Permanent Committee
convoked this 8th Conference of Foreign Ministers,
requested by the Colombian government invoking the
Inter-American Reciprocal Assistance Treaty.
Colombian Minister Julio César Turbay Ayala had been
truly disturbed to find himself among the 81
passengers aboard a DC-8 which, after taking off
from Mexico City, was hijacked to Havana. Ironically,
for several days prior to the incident, he had been
traveling around the region gathering support for
the anti-Cuban Conference. Apparently, turning back
an invasion organized by the United States had made
the island country a threat. Ayala could breathe
easier when Fidel Castro and Raúl Roa appeared at
Havana airport and treated him with all due respect
given his position.
"My interview with Castro in Havana
has given me the impression that, in a somewhat
curious way, Cuba's international relations have
improved," he declared to UPI in Miami. Nevertheless,
four months later, Turbay alleged as a reason to
expel Cuba, an "intervention by extra-continental
powers in the region."
Thus, from January 22 through 31,
1962, the meeting in Punto del Este, Uruguay,
constituted a continuation of U.S. machinations to
nip the Cuban Revolution in the bud. The intrigue
had begun as early as December, 1958, when the
Eisenhower administration realized that the Rebel
Army was about to defeat the Batista dictatorship.
"Washington was making confidential contacts with
OAS ambassadors, urging them to pressure the rebels
and the Batista regime, so that a moderate
government could assume power." (3). The maneuvers
continued into 1959 itself during the 5th OAS
meeting in Santiago de Chile, followed in 1960 by
the 6th and 7th in San José, Costa Rica.
The gaudy, exclusive beach resort in
Punta del Este turned out to be an ideal venue for
the U.S. objectives to be met. It was at a distance
from the capital, visited by rich Argentine tourists
and well-off Uruguayans, thus ensuring that the
combatitive Uruguayan people would not interfere.
However, it was only a partial victory for the
organizers. Uruguayan workers made use of resources
available to make their presence known, despite the
restrictions. They marched on foot from Montevideo
to Punta del Este, attracting a lot of attention
days prior to the event. A giant banner of
solidarity from the people expressed, all along the
route to Punto del Este, that the people were on
Cuba's side.
In the 8th OAS meeting, Cuba was
excluded from future participation with nine
resolutions, including one condemning the country,
given "the presence of a Marxist-Leninist government
in Cuba which publicly identifies with the doctrines
and foreign policy of Communist powers." The group
deemed this "doctrine" as incompatible with the
inter-American system, thus expelling Cuba from the
OAS and the inter-American defense command. There
were 14 votes in favor, one against (Cuba), with the
majority of the most important Latin American
countries abstaining: Argentina, Mexico, Brazil,
Bolivia, Chile and Ecuador.
The Argentine delegation asserted
that the proposed application of coercive measures
against Cuba was illegal, without prior
authorization by the United Nations Security Council.
But President Kennedy was intent
upon putting an end to the Cuban Revolution,
although he wasn’t willing to send in U.S. troops to
prevent the triumph of communism in Cuba, as his
military advisors and extremists in both parties
recommended. He had resisted their pressure to
intervene directly during the Playa Girón (Bay of
Pigs) debacle, but he had ordered the Defense
Department to prepare a plan against Cuba to
mitigate the torrent of Republican criticism,
especially that of Senator Barry Goldwater, who was
looking to succeed him as President. In a memorandum
to McNamara he directed the open utilization of U.S.
military forces, as Nixon had proposed. (4)
Nevertheless, and for two important
reasons, the support of the Soviet Union and its
leader Nikita Khrushchev, and the fear of unleashing
protest in Latin America, the U.S. had to proceed
cautiously. Thus, Kennedy commissioned Presidential
advisor Richard Goodwin to work on the ‘Cuba issue’
and seek support for the U.S. position among Latin
American governments, while at the same time
preparing to launch the multi-faceted Operation
Mongoose which included terrorist plots and economic
sanctions. Trapped in this duality, Kennedy admitted
to journalist Tad Szulc that he was being pressured
to approve the assassination of Fidel and asked him
his opinion. The CIA had already been in touch with
the Italian-American mafia about carrying out such a
criminal attack.
Peru’s proposal for a meeting to
discuss anti-Cuba measures had been rejected since
it was discussed in the OAS Council, by six
countries plus Cuba. Another proposal by Colombia
was approved in December, 1961, two days after Fidel
had declared the Revolution’s socialist nature.
Kennedy met in Palm Beach on
December 24 with Argentine President Frondizi who
was attempting to play a mediating role,
recommending negotiations. Frondizi thought that
discussing sanctions against Cuba in a meeting would
have repercussions within Argentina and affect the
elections scheduled for March 1962. The Cuban
question was becoming an internal problem for him,
with pressure coming from both supporters and
detractors of Cuba. Kennedy urged him to support the
expulsion of Cuba from the OAS.
During the 8th Consultation Meeting
of Foreign Relations Ministers, Frondizi did not
align Argentina with the United States, but rather
abstained along with Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador
and Mexico. The Argentine military command demanded
that Frondizi break off diplomatic relations with
Cuba, as its members had been insisting since 1960,
and the President complied on February 8, 1962. This
did not, however, prevent him from being ousted.
Washington did not allow any exceptions. The
presidents of Brazil and Bolivia and Ecuador were
all subsequently removed, as well.
Resolution No. 6, adopted in Punto
del Este, has served for years as the primary
justification for maintaining sanctions against
Cuba, euphemistically called an embargo, as a result
of its alliance with the Soviet Union, despite the
fact that that country has long ceased to exist and
the OAS itself has rejected Cuba’s alleged "incompatibility."
(1) Miami Herald. 05/29/11
(2 ) Tim Weiner, Legado de
Cenizas. La historia de la CIA. Random House
Mondadori. Tercera Edición. P.189
(3) John Dorschner & Roberto
Fabricio. The Winds of December. Coward,
McCann & Geoghegan New York 1980. P.190
(4) Jim Rasenberger. Brilliant
Disaster. Simon and Schuster. New York 2011.
P317 .
|