| Our brothers and sisters who died off the Barbados coast are
symbols in the battle against terrorism
We have every right to ask what measures are
to be taken with Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch, those responsible for that monstrous
incident Let justice be done in the case of the terrorist professionals who are
still acting against Cuba from the United States
Key address by Dr. Fidel Castro Ruz,
President of the Republic of Cuba, at a massive demonstration commemorating the 25th
anniversary of the terrorist act against a Cubana jetliner off the coast of Barbados.
Revolution Square, October 6, 2001
Compatriots:
History can be
unpredictable and move along strange labyrinths. Twenty-five years ago, in this very same
square, we bid a final farewell to a small number of coffins. They contained tiny
fragments of human remains and personal belongings of some of the 57 Cubans, 11 Guyanese
--most of them students on scholarships in Cuba-- and five North Korean cultural officials
who were the victims of a brutal and inconceivable act of terrorism. What was particularly
moving was the death of almost the entire Cuban juvenile fencing team, both women and men,
coming home with every single one of the gold medals awarded in this sport at a Central
American and Caribbean tournament.
A million of our compatriots, with tears filling
their eyes and running down their cheeks, gathered here to bid a more symbolic than actual
farewell to our brothers and sisters whose bodies rested on the ocean floor.
Nobody, except for a group of friendly personalities
and institutions, shared our pain and sorrow. There was no upheaval around the world, no
acute political crises, no United Nations meetings, nor the imminent threat of war.
Perhaps, few people in the world understood the
terrible significance of that event. How important could it be that a Cuban jetliner was
blown up in mid-flight with 73 people aboard? It was almost a common occurrence. Thousands
of Cubans had already died in La Coubre, the Escambray Mountains, the Bay of Pigs, and in
hundreds of other terrorist acts, pirate attacks and similar actions, had they not? Who
could pay any attention to the denunciations of this tiny country? All that was needed,
apparently, was a simple denial from the powerful neighbor and their media, which inundate
the world, and the matter was forgotten.
Who could have predicted that almost exactly 25 years
later, a war with totally unpredictable consequences would be on the verge of breaking out
as a result of an equally heinous terrorist attack, which claimed the lives of thousands
of innocent people in the United States? Back then, in what now appears to be a tragic
omen, innocent people from various countries died; this time, there were victims from 86
nations.
Then, as now, there was hardly anything left of the
victims. In Barbados, not a single body could be recovered and in New York, only a few
were and not all of them identifiable. In both cases, the families were left with an
appalling emptiness and infinite grief; a deep indignation and an unbearable sorrow was
brought on the peoples of both nations. It had not been an accident, a mechanical failure
or a human error; these were both deliberate acts, planned and executed in cold blood.
There were, however, a few differences between the
monstrous crime in Barbados and the abhorrent, unimaginable terrorist attack against the
American people. In the United States, the act was the work of fanatics willing to die
alongside their victims, while in Barbados it was the work of mercenaries who did not run
the slightest risk. In the United States, the main goal of the perpetrators was not that
of killing the passengers. They hijacked the planes to attack the Twin Towers and the
Pentagon, albeit absolutely mindless of the death of the innocent traveling with them. In
Barbados, the basic objective of the mercenaries was to kill the passengers.
In both cases, the anguish suffered by the travelers
in those final minutes of their lives, particularly the passengers on the fourth plane
hijacked in the United States who already knew what had happened in New York and
Washington must have been unbearable, the same as that of the crew and passengers of
the Cuban plane during the desperate attempt to land when it was clearly impossible for
them to do so. There were clear demonstrations of courage and determination in both cases
as well: in Barbados, we learned of them through the recorded voices of the Cuban crew; in
the United States, through subsequent reports on the attitude assumed by the passengers.
There is moving filmed footage of the horrific events
in New York. As for the explosion of the plane off the coasts of Barbados and its plunge
into the sea, there could not be, and there is not, so much as a photograph. The only
testimony lefts are the recordings of the dramatic communications between the crew of the
doomed aircraft and the Barbados airport control tower.
This was the first time in the history of Latin
America that such an act had been promoted from abroad.
Actually, the systematic use of such politically
motivated ruthless and fearsome practices and procedures was initiated in this hemisphere
against our country. But, it was preceded in 1959 by another equally absurd and
irresponsible practice: that of hijacking and diverting planes in mid-flight, a phenomenon
that was practically unknown in the world at the time.
The first of such acts involved a DC-3 passenger
plane bound from Havana to the Isle of Youth. It was hijacked by a few former members of
Batistas tyranny repressive corps, who forced the pilot to change course and fly
them to Miami. This happened on April 16, 1959, less than four months after the triumph of
the Revolution. The perpetrators were never punished.
Between 1959 and 2001, a total of 51 Cuban jetliners
were hijacked and most of them diverted to the United States. Many of these hijacked
aircraft were never returned to our country despite the fact that not a few pilots, guards
and other people were murdered or injured. Also, several planes were destroyed or
seriously damaged in frustrated hijacking attempts.
The consequence of this was that the plague of
"skyjacking" soon spread throughout the United States itself. For the most
varied reasons, a number of individuals the vast majority of them mentally
unbalanced, thrill-seekers or common criminals, from both the United States and Latin
America started to hijack airplanes using guns, knives, Molotov cocktails, and on a
number of occasions, simple bottles of water, which they claimed contained gasoline and
would be used to set fire to the plane.
Thanks to the painstaking care of our authorities,
not a single accident occurred upon landing. The passengers always received proper
treatment and were immediately returned to their places of origin.
The majority of hijackings and diversions of Cuban
aircraft took place between 1959 and 1973. Faced with the risk of a major catastrophe in
the United States or Cuba given that there were even hijackers who, once they had
the plane under control, threatened to fly it into the Oak Ridge nuclear power station [in
the United States] if their demands were not met the Government of Cuba took the
initiative of approaching the Government of the United States --led at the time by
President Richard Nixon, with William Rogers as Secretary of State-- and proposing an
agreement to deal with cases of aircraft hijacking and maritime piracy. The proposal was
accepted, and the agreement was quickly drawn up and signed by representatives of both
governments on February 16, 1973. It was also immediately published in our countrys
press and given wide coverage.
That rational and well thought-out agreement
established heavy sanctions against hijackers of planes and boats, and it did serve as a
deterrent. From that date forward, there was a considerable reduction in the hijacking of
Cuban planes, and for more than ten years, every attempted hijacking in our country was
foiled.
However, the brutal terrorist attack that led to the
explosion of the Cuban plane in mid-flight dealt a devastating blow to that exemplary and
effective agreement. The Cuban government, faced with this inconceivable act of aggression
that had taken place as part of a new wave of terrorist acts unleashed against Cuba in
late 1975, denounced the agreement, in full accordance with the clauses stipulated
therein. Nevertheless, it did continue to abide by the procedures set forth to prevent the
hijackings of U.S. planes, including the application of heavy sanctions, which had been
considerably stepped up as a result of the agreement, with sentences of up to 20 years
imprisonment. Even before the agreement was signed, Cuban courts had been applying the
sanctions provided in our own Penal Code against hijackers, although these had been less
severe.
Despite the rigorous application of sanctions, a few
other American jetliners were hijacked and diverted to our country. Then, the Government
of Cuba, after issuing duly advanced warnings, decided to return two hijackers to the
United States; thus, on September 18, 1980, they were delivered to the authorities of that
country.
Our records show that between September 1968 and
December 1984, there were 71 cases of airplanes hijacked and diverted to Cuba. Sixty-nine
participants in these hijackings faced trials in courts of law and were given prison
sentences ranging between three and five years. Subsequently, after the signing of the
1973 agreement, sentences ranged between 10 and 20 years.
As a result of these measures adopted by Cuba, the
fact is that for the last 17 years there has not been a single further hijacking or
diversion of an U.S. plane to Cuba.
On the other hand, what has been the stance of
successive U.S. administrations? Since 1959, until today, the U.S. authorities have not
sanctioned a single one of the hundreds of individuals who have hijacked and diverted
dozens of Cuban aircraft to that country, not even those have committed murder in the
course of the hijacking.
It is impossible to conceive of a greater lack of
basic reciprocity, or a greater incitement to the hijacking of planes and boats. This
unbending policy has remained unchanged throughout more than four decades and continues to
be maintained today, without a single exception.
The constructive agreement on the hijacking of planes
and boats signed between the governments of Cuba and the United States, whose results were
immediately evident, was seemingly accepted by the top leaders of the terrorist groups.
Some had actively cooperated or participated in the organization of irregular warfare
through armed gangs that, at times, had expanded to the six former provinces of Cuba. The
majority of them had been recruited by the U.S. government in the days of the Bay of Pigs
invasion, the Missile Crisis, and in later years. They participated in all manner of
violent actions, particularly assassination plots and terrorist attacks, that did not
leave out a single sphere of the countrys economic and social life, a single method,
a single procedure, a single weapon.
They were taken to all kinds of institutions, schools
and training programs, sometimes to be trained, sometimes to be kept busy.
Dramatic events like the assassination of President
Kennedy led to in-depth investigations, like that carried out by an U.S. Senate Committee.
The embarrassing situations and major scandals that resulted forced a change in tactics,
although there was never really any change in the policy towards Cuba. As a consequence,
after periods of relative calm, new waves of terrorism have continued to break out.
II PART
|