'Stinking
Evidence' of Possible Election Fraud Found in
Florida
By Thom Hartmann
CommonDreams.org
There was something odd about the poll tapes.
A "poll tape" is the phrase used to describe
a printout from an optical scan voting machine made
the evening of an election, after the machine has
read all the ballots and crunched the numbers on its
internal computer. It shows the total results of the
election in that location. The printout is signed by
the polling officials present in that precinct/location,
and then submitted to the county elections office as
the official record of how the people in that
particular precinct had voted. (Usually each
location has only one single optical scanner/reader,
and thus produces only one poll tape.)
Bev Harris of www.blackboxvoting.org, the
erstwhile investigator of electronic voting
machines, along with people from Florida Fair
Elections, showed up at Florida's Volusia County
Elections Office on the afternoon of Tuesday,
November 16, 2004, and asked to see, under a public
records request, each of the poll tapes for the 100+
optical scanners in the precincts in that county.
The elections workers - having been notified in
advance of her request - handed her a set of
printouts, oddly dated November 15 and lacking
signatures.
Bev pointed out that the printouts given her
were not the original poll tapes and had no
signatures, and thus were not what she'd requested.
Obligingly, they told her that the originals were
held in another location, the Elections Office's
Warehouse, and that since it was the end of the day
they should meet Bev the following morning to show
them to her.
Bev showed up bright and early the morning of
Wednesday the 17th - well before the scheduled
meeting - and discovered three of the elections
officials in the Elections Warehouse standing over a
table covered with what looked like poll tapes. When
they saw Bev and her friends, Bev told me in a
telephone interview less than an hour later, "They
immediately shoved us out and slammed the door."
In a way, that was a blessing, because it led
to the stinking evidence.
"On the porch was a garbage bag," Bev said, "and
so I looked in it and, and lo and behold, there were
public record tapes."
Thrown away. Discarded. Waiting to be hauled
off.
"It was technically stinking, in fact," Bev
added, "because what they had done was to have
thrown some of their polling tapes, which are the
official records of the election, into the garbage.
These were the ones signed by the poll workers.
These are something we had done an official public
records request for."
When the elections officials inside realized
that the people outside were going through the trash,
they called the police and one came out to challenge
Bev.
Kathleen Wynne, a www.blackboxvoting.org
investigator, was there.
"We caught the whole thing on videotape," she
said. "I don't think you'll ever see anything like
this - Bev Harris having a tug of war with an
election worker over a bag of garbage, and he held
onto it and she pulled on it, and it split right
open, spilling out those poll tapes. They were
throwing away our democracy, and Bev wasn't going to
let them do it."
As I was interviewing Bev just moments after
the tussle, she had to get off the phone, because, "Two
police cars just showed up."
She told me later in the day, in an on-air
interview, that when the police arrived, "We all had
a vigorous debate on the merits of my public records
request."
The outcome of that debate was that they all
went from the Elections Warehouse back to the
Elections Office, to compare the original, November
2 dated and signed poll tapes with the November 15
printouts the Elections Office had submitted to the
Secretary of State. A camera crew from
www.votergate.tv met them there, as well.
And then things got even odder.
"We were sitting there comparing the real [signed,
original] tapes with the [later printout] ones that
were given us," Bev said, "and finding things
missing and finding things not matching, when one of
the elections employees took a bin full of things
that looked like garbage - that looked like polling
tapes, actually - and passed by and disappeared out
the back of the building."
This provoked investigator Ellen Brodsky to
walk outside and check the garbage of the Elections
Office itself. Sure enough - more original, signed
poll tapes, freshly trashed.
"And I must tell you," Bev said, "that
whatever they had taken out [the back door] just
came right back in the front door and we said, 'What
are these polling place tapes doing in
your dumpster?'"
A November 18 call to the Volusia County
Elections Office found that Elections Supervisor
Deanie Lowe was unavailable and nobody was willing
to speak on the record with an out-of-state reporter.
However,
The Daytona Beach News (in Volusia County), in a
November 17th article by staff writer Christine
Girardin, noted, "Harris went to the Department of
Elections' warehouse on State Road 44 in DeLand on
Tuesday to inspect original Nov. 2 polling place
tapes, after being given a set of reprints dated
Nov. 15. While there, Harris saw Nov. 2 polling
place tapes in a garbage bag, heightening her
concern about the integrity of voting records."
The Daytona Beach News further noted that, "[Elections
Supervisor] Lowe confirmed Wednesday some backup
copies of tapes from the Nov. 2 election were
destined for the shredder," but pointed out that,
according to Lowe, that was simply because there
were two sets of tapes produced on election night,
each signed. "One tape is delivered in one car along
with the ballots and a memory card," the News
reported. "The backup tape is delivered to the
elections office in a second car."
Suggesting that duplicates don't need to be
kept, Lowe claims that Harris didn't want to hear an
explanation of why some signed poll tapes would be
in the garbage. "She's not wanting to listen to an
explanation," Lowe told the News of Harris. "She has
her own ideas."
But the Ollie North action in two locations
on two days was only half of the surprise that
awaited Bev and her associates. When they compared
the discarded, signed, original tapes with the
recent printouts submitted to the state and used to
tabulate the Florida election winners, Harris says a
disturbing pattern emerged.
"The difference was hundreds of votes in each
of the different places we examined," said Bev, "and
most of those were in minority areas."
When I asked Bev if the errors they were
finding in precinct after precinct were random, as
one would expect from technical, clerical, or
computer errors, she became uncomfortable.
"You have to understand that we are non-partisan,"
she said. "We're not trying to change the outcome of
an election, just to find out if there was any
voting fraud."
That said, Bev added: "The pattern was very
clear. The anomalies favored George W. Bush. Every
single time."
Of course finding possible voting "anomalies"
in one Florida county doesn't mean they'll show up
in all counties. It's even conceivable there are
innocent explanations for both the mismatched counts
and trashed original records; this story undoubtedly
will continue to play out. And, unless further
investigation demonstrates a pervasive and statewide
trend toward "anomalous" election results in many of
Florida's counties, odds are none of this will
change the outcome of the election (which exit polls
showed John Kerry winning in Florida).
Nonetheless, Bev and her merry band are off
to hit another county.
As she told me on her cell phone while
driving toward their next destination, "We just put
Volusia County and their lawyers on notice that they
need to continue to keep a number of documents under
seal, including all of the memory cards to the
ballot boxes, and all of the signed poll tapes."
Why?
"Simple," she said. "Because we found
anomalies indicative of fraud."