|
|
|
N A
T I O N A L |
Havana.
September 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
2.3 Damage caused to the
academic, scientific, cultural and sports exchanges
between the Cuban and American people.
As well as the aforementioned economic losses,
there is also the attempt by the US government to
bring the academic, scientific, cultural and
sporting exchange between the two countries to a
halt:
Cuban institutions and writers cannot take
part in the Book Fairs in the United States, or
in the San Juan Fair in Puerto Rico. As they
were unable to participate in either of the last
2 San Juan Fairs, the country lost out on around
15 thousand dollars, which could have been used
to finance a popular edition of ‘El Quijote’, by
Cervantes, of no less than 7 thousand copies.
Participation by Cuban scientists in scientific
meetings and events, some of which are multilateral,
is becoming systematically hindered, as they are not
granted entry visas for the United States. Among the
dozens of events that they are unable to attend are
the following:
The 29th International Congress on
Sanitary and Environmental Engineering. San
Juan, Puerto Rico, 22 to 26 August 2004.
The Scientific Exchange between the
University of Harvard and the Pedro Kourí Cuban
Institute of Tropical Medicine. Boston, 1 to 10
September 2004.
Scientific Exchange on Cuba’s experience of
preventing Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary
Health Care. San Juan, Puerto Rico, 3 to 13
November 2004.
The110 Annual Meeting of the American
Association of Urology. Texas, 21 to 26 May
2005.
Annual meeting of the American Association of
Oncology, Orlando, Florida, 13 to 17 May 2005.
The 20th Congress of the Latin
American Studies Association (LASA), held in
October 2004, in Las Vegas. All of the Cuban
academics invited to take part – 64 in total –
were denied the visas in a completely
unprecedented act.
Since 2004, when the additional measures to ban
trips to Cuba were enacted, the number of trips made
to the country by American students has been reduced
to a minimum. The travel license granted by the
Treasury Department was withdrawn from the American
NGO, MEDICC. This organisation used to offer courses
every year for 200 students and teachers of
medicine, nursing and public health.
The US government prevented American scientists
and academics from participating in several
scientific meetings and events held in Cuba,
including:
The International Conference on Maxillofacial
Surgery, in June 2004. The 50 Americans who
wished to attend were denied permission to
travel to Cuba.
The Pan-American Congress on Child and
Juvenile Mental Health, Havana, from 30 March to
1 April 2004. Some days before it was due to
start, the 160 Americans who had confirmed their
participation, received a letter from the OFAC
threatening them with strict
sanctions and forbidding them from taking
part. This event was sponsored by the Latin
American Psychiatry Association and the American
Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP)
Sporting exchanges have also been affected by
the intensification of the blockade. An example of
this is the elimination of the General License for
American athletes to take part in the amateur and
semi-professional competitions held in Cuba, even
when they are sponsored by an International
Federation. The decrease in the number of athletes
from this country taking part in events held in Cuba
was notable. In 2004, the number was as low as 128
athletes, compared to 2003 when the number was 603.
In the first four months of 2005, a total of 34
athletes took part in sporting events held in Cuba.
In November 2004 the disabled athletes of World
Team Sport met with difficulties concerning their
participation in the Marabana marathon, due to the
fact that their travel license had been revoked in
2003. 90 runners who usually take part in this
competition were unable to do so.
Between April 2004 and May 2005, four delegations
comprising 5 Cuban sport officials did not receive
the visas to travel to the United States, even
though they were going to participate in important
congresses and courses relating to Olympic
Solidarity.
The refusal to grant licenses to and/or remove
barriers and administrative and bureaucratic
obstacles blocking the way of university exchange
programmes between the United States and the
University of Havana, as well as the banning of
American students and teachers from traveling to
Cuba, have been practices permanently upheld by
different US administrations for over 40 years.
These, however, have reached levels of irrationality
under the current authorities.
During the period in question, 6 semester
programmes for American students in the University
of Havana were cancelled. These were organised by
entities such as: The Center for Cross Cultural
Studies; Council for International Educational
Exchange; Institute for Study Abroad-Butler
University; School for International Training; Lexia
International and Crucero Semestre en el Mar. In
comparison with last year’s course, in the current
academic year of 2004-2005, enrollment for the
programmes organised by the five centres listed
above fell by 253 students, that is to say, it
decreased more than 15 times.
In the specific case of Crucero Semestre en el
Mar,
this programme
worked
with the
University of Havana on two occasions during the
academic year of 2003-2004; 1.322 students and
teachers were involved in these. Due to the fact
that the programme was cancelled, this academic year
no student or teacher associated with the programme
has been able to travel to Cuba.
The greatest impact came in the form of the
losses to the University of Havana caused by the
Investigation Projects that were cancelled or never
initiated, in spite of the interest shown by the US
counterpart. Some examples of this are given below:
A young Cuban scientist from the Faculty of
Biology won approval, by way of a competition,
by the University of Harvard for a molecular
biology project on the development of vaccinal
adjuvants, for an estimated sum of 20 thousand
dollars. The commencement of this project has
been delayed for 3 years and processing for its
realisation is still under dispute. If it were
to get underway, it would prove useful to the
production of various vaccinations, which, of
course, would not just benefit Cuba.
Six Investigation Projects and an academic
exchange programme with the CUNY City
University of New York, and with the
Universities of South Florida and Gainsville,
among others, organised by the Centre for
International Migration Studies and dealing with
various issues of identity and migration have
been interrupted.
The Faculty of Law had its Academic Exchange
Programme with the Cuba-USA Legal Forum, dealing
with the legal systems in Cuba and the United
States, cancelled.
Joint investigation projects on Human Rights,
Constitutional Law and Criminal Law with the
National Lawyer Gild, Yale University, The
University of California and the Cuba-USA Legal
Forum have all been cancelled.
The project on spatial inequalities between
the Centre for Health and Human Well-Being and
the University of Tulane was cancelled.
3. SOME OF THE WAYS IN
WHICH THE BLOCKADE AFFECTS THE US ECONOMY, THE US
PEOPLE AND OTHER NATIONS
The policy of the blockade is also detrimental to
citizens of the United States and third countries.
If the blockade were to be lifted it would create
100 thousand jobs and additional earnings of 6
thousand million dollars for the US economy,
according to a study presented by the Director of
the Centre for Business and Investigations at the
University of South Alabama, in the Fourth National
Summit on Cuba, which took place in Mobile,
Alabama, in June of this year.
Another study carried out in 2000 by the World
Policy Institute of New York, revealed that the
unrestricted sale of food and medicine to Cuba alone
could generate 1600 million dollars a year – almost
4 times the current amount of food purchases made by
Cuba in the USA -, and 20 thousand additional jobs
for the United States economy.
Because of the blockade, the American economy
looses up to 1240 million dollars a year in
agricultural exportations and up to 3
thousand 600 million dollars every year in other
economic activity, according to studies carried out
by American institutions. 12.
According to estimates made in 2001 by the US
International Trade Commission, exportations from
the USA to Cuba would range between 658 and 1 200
million a year.
As maintained by another investigation, carried
out in 2004 by Tim Lynch, Necati Aydin and Julie
Harrington from the State University of Florida, 10
years after the blockade has been lifted,
exportations to the Island will swing between 6
thousand million and 9 thousand 470 million dollars
a year, with a net or surplus commercial bilateral
exportation potential for the USA of 3 thousand 600
million dollars.
Despite the ban on traveling to Cuba, subscribers
to the New York Travel and Leisure Magazine selected
Cuba as the best island in the Caribbean. For its
part, the National Geography Traveler Destination
Scoreboard reported that after surveying 200
specialists in sustainable tourism, the Historical
Centre of Havana was chosen among the best 115
places in the world. According to a survey carried
out in April 2001 by the Cuba Policy Foundation,
66.8% of Americans opined that they should be
allowed to travel to Cuba.
A study carried out in 2003 by the Brattle Group
revealed that visits by Cubans residing in the
United States would increase by 289 additional
thousand visitors a year, while visits by Americans
would rise to 2.8 million visitors (2.72 million
more than before), if the blockade was lifted. In
total it was predicted that 3.01 million additional
visitors from the United States would travel to Cuba
every year.
According to estimates, the lifting of travel
restrictions to Cuba alone would produce an annual
increase of income to the US economy of between 1180
and 1610 million dollars. This rise would create
between 16 thousand 888 and 23 thousand 20 new jobs.
On the report of other analyses, yearly trips to
Cuba from the United States would rise to 4 million
visitors in the first year. The most conservative
calculations give the figure for the number of
people who would arrive in Cuba from the United
States in the third year following the lifting of
the travel ban at 1.5 million. Based on this last
prediction, it is calculated that the elimination of
travel restrictions alone would produce a rise of
between 126 and 252 million dollars a year more than
the current amount in sales of agricultural products
from the USA to Cuba.
The total loss for American companies for every
million tourists who cannot visit Cuba reach 565
million dollars, broken down into:
Million dollars
|
Airlines.............................................................................. |
300 |
|
Travel Agencies and Tour
Operators............................ |
160 |
|
Importations to Cuba of food and
Drink........................... |
45 |
|
Other importations to
Cuba............................................. |
30 |
|
Publicity and Press
Agencies........................................... |
30 |
If the blockade were to be completely lifted, the
US economy would gain 545.6 million dollars and
would create 3 thousand 797 jobs after one year,
just in travel associated profit. Five years after
the lifting of the blockade, the US economy would be
making an additional profit to the tune of 1 972
million and would have created 12 thousand 180 jobs.
The lifting of the blockade could create an
annual income of between 2 thousand and 3 thousand
million dollars for American companies in the energy
sector, according to a study carried out by two
distinguished American economists from the sector in
December 2001.
In this work they showed that the blockade places
insurmountable obstacles in the way of the
significant cooperation potentials between Cuba and
the USA in the energy sector, limiting the options
for the strengthening of US energy security and the
diversification of the energy supply to Florida, and
restricting the alternatives for the relief of a
predictable deficit in the American local refinement
capacity. They also pointed out that Cuban waters
could offer a rich source of natural gas, with the
potential to export to Florida by gas pipelines,
affirming that if Cuba were to supply Florida with 2
million tons of gas a year, it would represent for
the United States a business opportunity worth 300
million dollars a year. They added that Cuban gas
could be profitably converted into liquid products
such as petrol or diesel through the construction of
a conversion plant.
As a result of this investigation, American
economists concluded that if the demand for energy
rises by 4% every year, Cuba will need to install
additional generator facilities producing 478
megawatts by the year 2015, and that the petrol
refinement capacity will have to be increased
between at least 30 thousand and 38 thousand barrels
a day.
As indicated, OFAC’s recent reinterpretation of
the concept of advanced payments for food purchases
made by Cuba in the US market has appreciable
negative consequences.
Between 2001 and March 2005, Cuban authorities
paid for American agricultural merchandise after the
products had left their port of origin or before
they arrived on the Island, within a period of 72
hours.
In 2005 Cuba will import between 750 thousand and
80 thousand tons of rice; in a short amount of time
the purchases could rise to one million tons. By
purchasing 100 thousand tons from the United States,
Cuba would hold third place in the list of the
biggest importers of this grain in the American
market. If normal transaction existed between the
two countries, and without getting rid of other
sources supplying rice to the Island, Cuba could
purchase between 500 thousand and 700 thousand tons
of rice every year from American producers; Cuba
would go on to occupy first or second place in the
list of the biggest importers of American rice.
This year Cuba will buy around 1 700 million
dollars worth of agro-foodstuff and was ready to
significantly increase the amount of purchases that
it made from the United States. If the current
commerce restrictions did not exist, the country
would have imported between 700 and 800 million
dollars worth of American agro-foodstuff. With this
the country would have increased two-fold the number
of purchases made last year, which were worth 450
million dollars.
As a result of the recent actions taken by the
OFAC, according to predictions made by the
Association of Apple Producers of the USA, the
exportation of this fruit to Cuba will fall by at
least 30%, when the harvest is picked this summer.
The state of Virginia exports around 80% of its
apples to the Island. As regards the dairy company
Dairy America, its shipments of skimmed powdered
milk destined for the Cuban market are now more
expensive and are slower to arrive, due to the new
OFAC regulations which impose additional expenses to
the sum of 3 thousand dollars on every consignment
of one thousand tons.
The fact that Cuban institutions are prohibited
from taking part in the clinical trials for
medication made in the United States also directly
affects the American people and other countries, For
example, the American designers of the trials for
medication against sicklemia opine that Cuban
participation would have made it possible to get to
the new medication on the market at least a year
earlier, because the trials would have benefited
from a national register of patients suffering from
this disease, something which exists in Cuba but
which the United States does not have.
The negative effects of the blockade in the field
of Cuban biotechnology also has detrimental
consequences for healthcare in underdeveloped
countries. In world terms, Cuba is the country with
the most preventive and therapeutic vaccinations
against the main diseases to affect the Third World,
with a total of 29 projects.
From more than 100 projects, the Pediatric Dengue
Vaccine Initiative (PDVI-USA) and the National
Vaccine Institute (IVD) of the Republic of Korea
chose one by the Centre for Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology of Cuba, because of its great
importance in the perspective obtaining of a
vaccination against Dengue, an illness that has many
underdeveloped countries in its grip. Financing was
given to the other 12 projects chosen, while Cuba’s
offering had to be rejected as a result of the
blockade.
In 2002 heart conditions took the lives of 240.8
of every 100 thousand citizens in the United States,
thus representing the main cause of death in this
country. Cerebrovascular complaints, with 56.2
deaths for every 100 thousand inhabitants,
represented the third main life taker.
In accordance with the editors of Harvard
International Review, Ryan Bradley and Edy Rim, an
independent evaluation of the University of Geneva
named a new Cuban medication , PPG (Ateromixol or
Policosanol), created in 1991, as the best anti-cholesterol
drug on the market.
A scientific article entitled ‘Meta-Analysis of
Natural Therapies for Hyperlipidemia: Plant Sterols
and Stanols Versus Policosanol’, published in
Pharmacotherapy in 2005, pointed out that plant
stanols and sterols, available in the United States,
are well tolerated and safe, but Policosanol (PPG)
is more effective than the others at reducing LDL
cholesterol and is much better for the patient
because the dosage is only one tablet a day, it is
much cheaper and it is more likely to produce
cardiovascular benefits.
If the blockade did not exist, thousands and
maybe even hundreds of thousands of American
citizens would have survived or wouldn’t have
suffered from physical effects or other limitations
as a consequence of not receiving treatment, due to
absurd political reasons, with PPG, the cheapest and
most efficient anti-cholesterol medication available,
which was patented in Cuba.
With regards to cancer, since 1970 the lung
cancer mortality rate in the United States has been
higher than the rate for any other type of cancer.
The number of people who die of this disease every
year is exceeds 560 thousand people; each year one
million 250 thousand people fall ill with this
disease; approximately 166 thousand people die each
year from lung cancer alone and one in three women
and one in two men living in the United States today
will suffer from some type of cancer at some stage
of their lives.
After more than 30 years designing programmes and
spending more than 230 thousand million dollars, the
result of the US struggle against cancer has been
minimal. If the blockade did not exist, the Cuban
biotechnology institutions that are working on
several advanced research projects such as
therapeutic vaccinations against different types of
cancer – 10 projects – or monoclonal antibodies
patented for the early diagnosis of cancer, among
others, could help to confront this serious illness.
CONCLUSIONS
The direct economic damage inflicted on the
Cuban people by the application of the blockade,
taken from preliminary conservative calculations,
exceeds 82 thousand million dollars; an average of
1 782 million dollars a year. This sum does not
include the more than 54 thousand million dollars
attributable to direct damage to the country’s
economic and social objectives by way of sabotage
and terrorist acts encouraged, organised and
financed from the United States; nor does it
include the value of the products that were not
produced or the damage caused by the onerous
credit conditions imposed on Cuba. The detrimental
effects to the country this year surpassed 2
thousand 764 million dollars.
In its second term in office, the
Administration of President George W. Bush
continues to take its policy of aggression and
blockade against the people of Cuba to new heights,
in blatant contempt of the principles of the
United Nations Charter and International Law, of
the freedom of commerce and navigation, and of the
repeated and almost unanimous desire of the
international community to put an end to this
genocidal policy, as expressed in successive
resolutions passed by the General Assembly.
The application of the blockade severely
affects not only the Cuban people: it is also
detrimental to the interests and rights of the
people of the United States and other countries
around the world. Last year was marked by an
increase in the extraterritorial effect of the
blockade, when the regulations, sanctions and
threats against foreign citizens and companies
were made stricter and more fierce.
The Cuban people will never renounce their
independence, sovereignty and right to free rule.
Despite the blockade, this decision has allowed us
to build an increasingly just, fair and cultured
society that upholds ideals of solidarity with
other peoples from countries around the world,
including the United States.
Cuba knows that it can continue to count on the
support of the international community in
defending its just call for the economic,
commercial and financial blockade imposed on the
Cuban people by the United States Government to be
lifted.
(Continued... 1,
2,
3,
4,
5, 6) |
|
|
|
|