|
|
|
C
O D E 6 2 6 0 |
Havana.
February 2 2006 |
|
|
|
The Palestinian Election
RAMON
RODRIGUEZ
ph/fax-805-524-5480
Copyright MMVI
Calling the outcome of the Palestinian
parliamentary elections a "political earthquake",
which seems to be the cliché du jour used to
describe the election, seems to be an understatement,
with "sea-change" a better term for capturing the
enormity of what has just happened in Palestine. For
not only is Palestine now controlled for the first
time by another political party, Fatah having been
thrown out of power by the voters after its forty
year domination of Palestinian politics, but that
nascent nation state is now controlled by a
fundamentalist religious faction similar to that
which rules in Teheran, a faction that is bent on
the destruction of Israel, and which clearly aims to
impose an Islamic rule of law in the West Bank and
Gaza.
To make matters worse from the point of view of
the Americans and the Israelis, both now must deal
with Hamas, regardless of their knee-jerk comments
to the contrary. While Palestine Authority President
Mahmoud Abbas, aka Abu Mazen, is speculating that
the peace process might continue through the good
offices of the Palestinian Liberation Organization,
this speculation assumes that he will remain in
office, which considering the election results is
quite debatable. His legitimacy has been all but
destroyed, as has that of Fatah and by extension,
the PLO, which is why Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia
and his Cabinet were forced to quit their posts even
before the smoke had cleared. If the PM and his
Cabinet were forced to give up the ghost, why should
the fate of Mr. Abbas be any different? Also de-legitimized
and rejected out right is the so-called "road map"
for peace co-sponsored by the US: the vote was not
just an anti-Fatah vote, and a vote against its
corrupt and ineffectual ways, as well as those of
the PLO itself, but was also quite obviously a
rebuke of the Old Guard’s pursuit of peace with the
Israelis. The Palestinian people are obviously
frustrated with the glacial pace of peace
negotiations, and are just as frustrated with the
results so far of the on-again, off-again peace
process, which Fatah, the PLO and the Palestinian
Authority have been pursuing for more than a decade.
Now everything is stake, is at risk, even the
Palestinian Authority, which entity was largely the
creation after all of Fatah and the PLO.
The Israelis and the Americans should get used to
the idea of a Hamas government and the sooner they
adjust to the new reality in Palestine the better,
for otherwise both might respond to the ascendancy
of Hamas in ways which they will come to regret.
They both should recognize that instead of dealing
and negotiating with one faction that had lost the
support of the Palestinian masses, they now must
parley with a whole new cast of characters,
politicians who just as clearly are supported by the
Palestinian multitudes and whose backing is a sine
qua non of any eventual peace agreement. Fatah,
the PLO and the Palestinian Authority could not make
a peace agreement stick, or even agree to one,
because they lacked the support of ordinary
Palestinians, while Hamas quite evidently enjoys
that kind of support which will translate to a
successful search for peace between the Israelis and
the Palestinians.
Just as the Israelis could not successfully find
their way to peace under the Labor Party or those
singled out as "soft on the Palestinians", and just
as it fell to hard-liner Ariel Sharon, who remains
in a coma and may not be with us for very much
longer, to lead his people out of the wilderness of
a constant war footing and towards a just and
lasting peace with the Palestinians, so it has
fallen to the leaders of Hamas, the quintessential
hard-line Palestinian faction, to lead their people
to the promised land of peace with the Israelis. It
is hugely ironic that Ariel Sharon, who opened the
door to peace betwixt his people and the
Palestinians, now lies comatose and near death,
whilst Hamas, Mr. Sharon’s analogue amongst the
Palestinians, now has sprung to life and is ready to
lead the Palestinian people to a just and lasting
peace, and to a long awaited and postponed statehood,
which they should have been given years ago, but
were not, owing to Israeli and American narrow-mindedness
and stubbornness.
Had both the Israelis and the Americans possessed
the foresight to come to terms with Yasser Arafat
and the Palestinian Authority on a peace settlement
when they had the opportunity, they would not now be
forced to deal with Hamas, which will now demand
even more onerous terms for peace than Mr. Arafat
ever would or could have. This is another ironic
result of the inability of the parties involved to
reach a meeting of the minds, and of the historic
Palestinian parliamentary election that has
completely and forever altered the political
landscape in the Middle East, and has either made
the possibility of peace between the Israelis and
the Palestinians more likely, or has made it even
less likely than ever before.
|
|
|
|
|