|
NICARAGUA
A question of sovereignty
BY
NIDIA DIAZ — Granma International staff writer —
NOBODY should be fooled. Washington still has the
huge bone of Daniel Ortega’s victory in the November
presidential elections stuck in its throat.
The
return of the Sandinista movement could lead the
empire to its old road of dirty war, perhaps
camouflaged this time but with the identical
purpose: to prevent Nicaragua from joining some of
its Latin American neighbors and advancing along the
road of nationalist, popular and revolutionary
change.
It
is not surprising that an urgent call has been made
from the White House for the Central American
country to continue its process of dismantling and
destroying Soviet-made Sam-7 rockets, begun in 2004
by President Enrique Bolaños; if it doesn’t, its
powerful neighbor would withdraw its monetary
military aid, meager crumbs from the North to pay
for servility and betrayal.
The
Daniel Ortega government, in a communiqué from its
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, expressed its right to
keep the aforementioned missiles while warning that
“no country can demand unilateral disarmament from
another.”
The
Nicaraguan country, autonomous and sovereign — the
official press release says — does not need another
country’s approval to determine “the appropriate
means of defending and safeguarding its
sovereignty.”
The
transnational media corporations rapidly placed the
issue in the headlines, saying that Managua’s
response “constituted a clear defiance of George W.
Bush,” and in that way, the big-business media is
beginning to design a matrix of opinion so that when
the moment comes, it can justify any escalation of
hostility against the Central American nation.
It
is not very credible, however, that the United
States should suddenly be worried about the 1,051
Sam-7 rockets that were not destroyed when
curiously, in 2005, then-U.S. Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld said he was satisfied by their
secure storage in Nicaraguan Army warehouses.
An
article titled “Rumsfeld satisfied with Sam-7
missiles,” published in the Nicaraguan newspaper
El Nuevo Diario, referred to an article
published on the Pentagon website, written by
Kathleen T. Rem, a member of the military’s press
service, expressing U.S. agreement with the no-risk
safekeeping of the armaments in question.
Now,
like pulling a rabbit out of a hat, the U.S.
government is brandishing its “concern” that the
anti-aircraft rockets in question could fall into
the hands of international terrorists.
Once
again, the empire is showing the double standard it
uses in approaches to the same subjects with
different actors, and President Ortega, a past
victim of such conduct, did not hesitate for an
instant in stating that the disarmament that
Washington is demanding from Nicaragua should be
equally applied to other Central American countries
like Honduras and Costa Rica, to cite just two
cases, which have not moved to comply with peace
agreements.
These agreements, signed from 1986 to 1987,
established the principle of reasonable balance of
forces, with a view to maintaining an equilibrium
among the region’s armed forces, which is why –
among other reasons – Nicaragua destroyed 1,000
Sam-7 rockets and considerably reduced its armed
forces.
Honduras, however, maintains an Air Force acquired
in the 1980s, when its territory served as a
launching pad for actions against the Sandinista
Revolution. More recently, the United States has
sold it other airplanes that while in theory are for
civilian use, are assigned to patrol the area for
drug traffickers or supposed terrorists.
“If
there were no military aviation in Central America,
there would simply be no reason for us to have
missiles here; but, given that there are, that
obliges us to keep them, to defend the country in
case an act of aggression were to occur,” the
president noted.
Ortega recalled that, were a conflict to occur
between the two countries, Honduran planes could
attack Managua with all of their firepower in less
than 25 minutes.
Meanwhile, it was learned that in Costa Rica, the
so-called civilian police forces have been
militarized to the max, participating in joint
maneuvers with the U.S. Navy patrols, whose ships
touch port in that nation, and could be used against
neighboring Nicaragua. And this is not a question of
susceptibility or suspicion.
Nicaragua’s recent history has many examples that
oblige it to maintain its defense capacity, even
more so now that the Sandinista party has a new
opportunity to take forward its program of social
justice that was cut off by the U.S. government
intervention and its financial and military support
to the counterrevolution, created by the United
States and used to destroy the Revolution.
Suffice to take a look at the press coverage of the
time to recall the historic photo in which the young
José Fernández Canales, of small stature, stands
next to his prisoner, the tall, blonde Eugene
Hasenfus of the United States. Hasenfus was taken
prisoner on October 6, 1986, when the plane he was
piloting to bring weapons to counterrevolutionaries
who had entered Nicaragua was shot down.
The
plane via which the mercenary had flown into the
country countless times was the proof needed for
even skeptics to realize that the war was one by the
U.S. against Nicaragua, and that the former had
dragged the governments of Honduras and El Salvador
into it as well.
In
addressing the National Assembly, where discussion
on the issue began, President Ortega asked
legislators not to approve destruction of the
rockets, given that opposition forces in Parliament
have said that they would vote in favor of
eliminating 651 of the 1,051 Sam-7 rockets.
“Conduct yourselves with a sense of patriotism,
because today they want the rockets destroyed, but
tomorrow they will want us to destroy our tanks, and
then our artillery and then they’ll want the Army to
disappear,” the president said.
Imperialist logic is to have everything or to
destroy everything.
Sufficient reason for justifying the principled
position of the Sandinista government in approaching
the Sam-7 rocket issue as an issue of sovereignty,
self-determination, and defense of national
integrity.
As
this article was being written, the National
Assembly’s leadership postponed discussion on the
controversial theme for now, until there is a
reasonable balance of forces in Central America.
Until then, there will be many pressures.
After 16 years of neoliberal governments at the
service of Washington, the Nicaraguans have learned
their lesson, as demonstrated by their choice at the
ballot box, and they will fight tooth and nail to
defend the return of the Sandinistas and their
program of justice and social equality. |