United States: Plan
Colombia and water
Joaquín Rivery Tur
• NATURE is passing the check on to the United
States. However, savage depredation of the
environment is not charging in dollars but in
conditions for survival.
One would be hard pressed to find any of the
great rivers and lakes in the United States that are
entirely free of virtual total contamination. In
Europe, clean water sources are rare. One would have
to travel deep into the mountains to find pure
currents and that country needs water for drinking,
agriculture and industry.
In this context, Latin America is also
experiencing the threat of the empire, with the
arrival of another stage of Plan Colombia, which has
been condemned by President Hugo Chávez. The
Venezuelan president perceives the Pentagon’s
strategy and its seven new military bases under
Bogotá’s consent as having precise targets: first,
the Orinoco oil belt; second, Amazonia; and third,
the Guaraní Aquifer, one of the largest deposits of
subterranean water. The Palanquero base – seemingly
the largest – assures an operational range of the
yanki forces covering all of South America. It is a
genuine risk.
The Guaraní Aquifer is a truly fabulous
underground water system and the United States has
been very interested in it for a number of years.
The research is being conducted by no less than
the World Bank, whose aim is not to supply water to
the millions of South Americans in need of it, but
to privatize the liquid. Six years ago an agreement
was signed for studies on the Guaraní Aquifer System,
with funding primarily from the United States (through
the World Bank), and some from Germany and Holland.
It smelled rotten from the outset.
Paul Wolfowitz, president of the World Bank at
the time, stated that funds from his institution
could only be used by the private sector for the
development of the subterraneous basin.
Sara Grusky, an official from the Water for All
NGO in Canada recently declared that international
organizations like the World Bank are seeking to
create a Guaraní industrial region without
concerning themselves with safeguarding the
conservation of the aquifer or the real interests of
the inhabitants, thus increasing the risks of
privatization.
Even more seriously, partial or total concessions
have been granted to transnational corporations
including the U.S. Monsanto Wells and Bechtel C, the
French Suez/ ONDEO division and Vivendi, the Spanish
Aguas de Valencia and Unión FENOSA ACEX, and the UK
Thames Water, among others.
Thus, it is becoming abundantly clear that the
Guaraní Aquifer System is one of the targets of the
U.S. military expansion in Colombia.
A journalist once asked if the United States
would attack South America for water and the day is
not so far off when the survival of many nations,
above all the rich ones, will be measured by the
liquid that they can conquer for their needs.
The Guaraní Aquifer System, shared by Brazil,
Paraguay, Argentina and Uruguay, has no less than 50
billion cubic kilometers of water in its substratum,
which extends over almost two million square
kilometers with a production capacity of 40-80
square kilometers daily. If the transnational
corporations gain control over that wealth, they
could industrialize the bottling of good, clean
water for export to the North, which is why
developed countries have encouraged the countries
involved to pass legislation permitting water
privatization.
The plan is advancing. The rich countries are on
the offensive and exerting pressure to make concrete
one of the greatest atrocities of neoliberalism:
converting water into a commodity.
Of the surface area covered by the Guaraní
Aquifer System (greater than France, Spain and
Portugal combined), 70% belongs to Brazil, 19% to
Argentina, 6% to Paraguay and the remaining 5% to
Uruguay. However, the exact limits of the system are
still unknown and the basin could be the world’s
greatest deposit of fresh water.
"The problem is not that water supplies are
decreasing, but that their location and quality are
changing," is the opinion of Mexican expert Gian
Carlo Delgado, author of the book Agua y
seguridad nacional (Water and National Security,
Mondadori). According to Delgado, it appears that
high biodiversity areas like the one that harbors
the Guaraní Aquifer will see an increase or at least
the conservation of their precipitation indexes and
therefore "are shaping up as strategic on a local,
regional, and global level."
Closely related to U.S. ambitions is another
point in a report by the former advisors of Reagan
and Bush Sr, which explains why it is a priority
that the countries of the Guaraní System should
enact legislation to protect water as a heritage of
those nations. The document stated that the United
States must ensure that "the natural resources of
the hemisphere are available in order to respond to
our national priorities."
In a relatively short space of time, those
intentions could become a reality. The covetousness
of transnational corporations, plus the requirements
of an empire that is losing water provide solid
supporting evidence for President Chávez’ fear that
the proliferation of U.S. military bases in Colombia
is directed at conquering the resources of South
America, where the Guaraní Aquifer System has so
much importance on account of its subterraneous and
surface water (between the Paraguay, Paraná and
Uruguay Rivers) and the biodiversity that it
contains.
The protection of this incalculable source of
clean water thus becomes a priority for all
governments that are genuinely committed to the
defense of national and continental interests
because, from the North, the thirsty vulture, driven
by the climate change that it itself is imposing, is
watching with carrion eyes and ready talons. The
bases in Colombia are the nests of these birds of
prey. •